Thursday, April 17, 2008

Brightmoor.

Although I'd like to say that this article suprised me, I can't. The neighborhoods of Detroit are known to be bad, and nobody seems to be doing anything about it. People wonder why the population in Detroit is decreasing at a rapid rate. The reason really is quite logical. Why would anyone in their right mind want to live somewhere with abandoned, dilapidated houses, burglars/robberies on a regular basis, and a city government that doesn't even care? Henderson reveals in his article a couple who deals with the consequences that come along with living in such a neighborhood. I think he used two specific literary devices that enhanced the effect of the article. The first is sarcasm. This increases the effect on reader's because it shows just how ridiculous the whole situation is. After Henderson reveals the Quades' "crime," he goes on to say, "The nerve! It was time to crack down." The sarcasm used here is obviously directed towards the city commission. They are worried about this old couple who almost always keeps their property presentable when there are much worse things happening there. The second device used is logos. Henderson supports his view on the whole ordeal with some very logical analyzations. He talks about how other residents in the neighborhood have their garbage cans out two or three days after garbage pick-up. Even though many others are guilty of the same crime, the city decides to single out one couple. Not only that, the Quades' probably have the best up-kept house in all of Brightmoor. Another good point that Henderson makes is the priorities of the city comission. They don't care about the grabage all over the place, or the crimes that occur on a regular basis, but yet they find it important to have pretty trees lining the street. This shows just how messed up the priorities of the city are. The Quades' have been complaing about this for a long time, yet they havn't gotten any response whatsoever.

6 comments:

MartyP said...

Dear Michelle,
Your blog page is stupendous. Your article for this week was spledid also. You do a great job of talking about the use of devices and the way you discussed the article made me all warm and fuzzy inside. I agree with your 200%!

JBrandt said...

Warm, fuzzy and spledid? I wasn't aware of that last adjective.

Junny Kim said...

Sarcasm! Yes! I totally agree that the use of sarcasm was vividly revealed throughout the article. Two weeks ago, I did a columnist and my columnist used very strong sarcasm to blame and mock Kwame. I think, since then, this is another article that uses sarcasm mocking the ticket.

Anonymous said...

Michelle,
I agree with you. Your use of the literary devices was excellent.
From, Abby

Anonymous said...

You are right. The city of Detroit does not care about garbage pick up in neighborhoods. I agree that scarcasm is used to reveal the unconcern of the city , and the fact they do nothing about it. Great Job writing

Anonymous said...

You are right. The city of Detroit does not care about garbage pick up in neighborhoods. I agree that scarcasm is used to reveal the unconcern of the city , and the fact they do nothing about it. Great Job writing